3) Other than seeking validation by discussing experiences with a group, is there a place we can go or a means we can use to determine the validity of the messages we receive?
I use what I call multisystem validation. In other words, I am checking the results of my intuition against other systems, like....: the best information of science facts that I have available, and against mine and others' experiences of what has worked before, and sometimes validating against someone else's intuition who has more experience in that particular communication realm than I do, another validation is simply is... is it working? lastly I'm working on a muscle testing validation technique (muscle testing works on the theory of attraction also). So in summary I look across multiple systems and the more systems that validate the experience or interpretation the more confident I am about the choice and interpretation.in bullet form here are my validation systems
SYSTEM CHECKS AVAILABLE IN MULTISYSTEM VALIDATION
- heart: love compassion- gut: instinct intuition- sensory feedback feelings (not talking about the interpretation of emotions like anger or sadness but does this "feel:" right, good, constructive, building on positive, see value selection criteria below)- past experience- past experience of other people I trust- muscle testing- Dr. Phil's how's that working for you? (outcome validation)- validation by another person's intuition and sensory feedback (heart and gut)- I will even validate by other cultures dogma or religious beliefsone note is that my multisystem validation is balanced in the interpretation value selection criteria I use below.
VALUE SELECTION CRITERIA
- love,- compassion- not imposing on others free will- maintaining my own free will- and that which will serve the highest good.- Inclusion versus exclusion- constructive versus destructive- healing versus wounding- connective versus disconnective
- good
- feelings
- makes sense vs makes confusion
- building on the positive
No comments:
Post a Comment